Hosted in Colombia last month, Cosmoverse 2022 curated thought leaders within the still nascent industry of blockchain interoperability. Among these speakers was industry veteran Kadan Stadelmann, who helped build Komodo, a technology that aims to facilitate a cross-chain future for blockchain networks.
Blockchain users cant trade bitcoin for dogecoin out of the box, as these cryptocurrencies live on distinct blockchains. Cross-chain bridges exist to transfer assets between chains, but these protocols lack necessary security for mainstream adoption. Komodo offers a different solution, delineated below.
Firstly, Benzinga asked Stadelmann about the Cosmos software-development kit, as the Cosmos SDK is now integrated with the AtomicDEX. The AtomicDEX is built on Komodo, and it offers a trustless solution for trading assets that live on separate blockchains.
BZ: What types of customizations does the Cosmos SDK offer that other blockchains cant provide?
I think in general the Cosmos SDK offers a basis to create independent blockchains with such a degree of customization opportunities, without needing to reinvent the wheel or get ultra deep in the smart contract coding stack. This is one huge difference other chains dont have. On Ethereum, you can set up a custom token, but with the Cosmos ecosystem you have an extreme degree of customization opportunities across the network. For example, transaction fees for apps built on Cosmos can be paid in the applications token, whereas all transactions on Ethereum are in Ether. – Stadelmann
BZ: Do you have any lofty goals for Atomic Swaps other than in DeFi?
I think one big sector is data exchange. At the end of the day, when we swap coins were swapping data. It could be an open market for knowledge transfers, such as scientific reports we exchange. Anything that has value and a digital representation could be swapped on AtomicDEX in the future. – Stadelmann
BZ: What parts of the user experience are streamlined by having a wallet and decentralized exchange (DEX) integrated in one application?
Technically, they are still two different things because they utilize two different APIs, but live within one product. If you look at the crypto wallet and the DEX on its own, what do people end up doing with them? They need to send funds from the wallet to the dex, then back to the wallet, using two different wallets from two different providers. We figured it makes sense for it to be served from one application. In fact, we figured that the user interfaces compliment each other. Thats one of the key factors that made us realize its time to unite these products. – Stadelmann
Multiple wallets are sometimes necessary when using different blockchainsits not an easy task to trade crypto between chains. Since AtomicDEX is multichain, it made sense for it to create a one-stop-shop for users to transact cross chain.
BZ: Is this a product of being cross chain?
Yes, absolutely. Its great that you mention we have so many applications, because then this problem multiplies. Its a complex matrix you find yourself in. Thats where the AtomicDEX doesnt try to just streamline user interfaces, but also authentication layers for wider access. Our team is currently implementing Kepler and Metamask authentication capabilities. The end user should be able to use the technology without needing to go a predefined path. Instead, they can use what theyre comfortable with. – Stadelmann
BZ: What benefits does AtomicDEX have over using a cross-chain bridge?
The key benefit here is that its 100% trustless in terms of theres no custodial operation on our end or the AtomicDEX network. Every user that provides liquidity to the exchanges becomes an infrastructure provider at the same time. I think one of the big differences here that highlights the key factor of being trustless is that we dont regulate control, liquidity, or order book mechanisms. This isnt always the case for other AMM (automated market maker) multichain setups. Theres been critical issues that have ended up on the end user on some of these networks.
BZ: The liquidity providers are infrastructure providers?
Every user that uses AtomicDEX also represents one instance in the network. Its like a node that can forward data packages to other peers, that can help other peers find new peers. The end user isnt just someone trading. Its someone whos scaling up the DEX network. This is the key difference between AtomicDEX and smart contract AMMs. Its a big difference in regards to the technology, but we're trying to solve similar problems. – Stadelmann
BZ: A lot has changed since Komodo launched its token. How has it adapted to new technologies such as alternative layer 1s and NFTs?
Back in the day, 7-8 years ago, we were the first ones to state a multichain vision of smartchain platforms. Thats how weve described Komodo for quite some time. Theres only one technology stack weve focused on since the start of Komodo: the exchange layer. At times other technologies would pop up that were hype and we would start some research, but it cost us too much resources. What we have been focused on is NFT support with AtomicDEX. Cross-chain NFT swaps arent live yet, but theyre in development. It's similar technology to what AtomicDEX has now, but with different transaction types. By focusing on our DEX, its enabled us to have the biggest support of 2nd and 3rd generation blockchain protocols. – Stadelmann
With over a decade of experience in blockchain technology, Stadelmann is a visionary that has built what may be the future of finance and beyond. As the industry is still in its infancy, theres still debate over whether or not the future is multi-chain, or simply multi-layer, in the case of Ethereum. That being said, if the future is multi-chain, then Komodo and AtomicDEX have cemented themselves at the forefront of the revolution.
