December 22, 2024
Can Diamond Dust Help Cool Earth? Exploring Costs, Geoengineering Risks
A study by Sandro Vattioni explores using 5 million tons of diamond dust annually to reduce global warming by 1.6ºC. Diamonds outperform sulfur in reflecting sunlight, but the method comes with an enormous price tag—$175 trillion. Despite its potential, experts like Douglas MacMartin question its feasibility due to costs, while others debate the overall risks of ge...

Injecting diamond dust into the atmosphere could potentially cool the planet by 1.6ºC, according to a recent study published in Geophysical Research Letters. Led by Sandro Vattioni, a climate scientist at ETH Zürich, the research explores whether diamonds, as opposed to commonly used materials like sulfur, could offer a safer and more effective method for stratospheric aerosol injection. This method is aimed at reflecting sunlight back into space to mitigate global warming.

Diamonds Versus Sulfur for Cooling

While sulfur has been studied as a cooling agent—largely inspired by volcanic eruptions that inject sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere—the material poses significant risks, including ozone depletion and acid rain. Diamonds, on the other hand, are chemically inert and would not contribute to these hazards. Vattioni and his team ran complex climate models to assess the impact of different materials. Diamonds stood out for their reflective properties and ability to remain aloft without clumping together.

The Steep Costs of Diamonds

Although diamonds could offer a promising solution, their cost is a major drawback. With synthetic diamond dust estimated to cost around $500,000 per ton, scaling up production to inject 5 million tons annually would demand an enormous financial commitment. According to Douglas MacMartin, an engineer at Cornell University, the cost of deploying diamond dust from 2035 to 2100 could reach $175 trillion. This price tag far exceeds the relatively inexpensive sulfur, which is readily available and much easier to disperse. MacMartin suggests that sulfur may still be the material of choice due to its lower cost and ease of use.

Debate Continues on Geoengineering

Geoengineering research, including the study of alternative materials like diamonds, remains a contentious topic. Critics like Daniel Cziczo, an atmospheric scientist at Purdue University, argue that the risks of unintended consequences outweigh the potential benefits. However, Shuchi Talati, executive director of the Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering, emphasises that research is essential for understanding all possible options, especially for nations most vulnerable to climate change

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who’sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.


Easy and Affordable: Exploring Bajaj Finserv’s Online Vehicle Insurance Solutions



Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra to Debut in Four Colourways, Tipster Claims