Faster, grippier, pricier, and just as Windows-ed — Asus ROG Ally X review: Better performance and feel in a pricey package A great hardware refresh, but it stands out for its not-quite-handheld cost.
Kevin Purdy – Updated Aug 30, 2024 11:30 am UTC Enlarge / It’s hard to fit the perfomance-minded but pricey ROG Ally X into a simple product category. It’s also tricky to fit it into a photo, at the right angle, while it’s in your hands.Kevin Purdy reader comments 79
The first ROG Ally from Asus, a $700 Windows-based handheld gaming PC, performed better than the Steam Deck, but it did so through notable compromises on battery life. The hardware also had a first-gen feel and software jank from both Asus own wraparound gaming app and Windows itself. The Ally asked an awkward question: Do you want to pay nearly 50 percent more than you’d pay for a Steam Deck for a slightly faster but far more awkward handheld?
Further ReadingThe Asus ROG Ally beats the Steam Deck at all but the most important thingsThe ROG Ally X makes that question more interesting and less obvious to answer. Yes, its still a handheld thats trying to hide Windows annoyances, and it’s still missing trackpads, without which some PC games just feel bad. And (review spoiler) it still eats a charge faster than the Steam Deck OLED on less demanding games.
But the improvements Asus made to this X sequel are notable, and its new performance stats make it more viable for those who want to play more demanding games on a rather crisp screen. At $800, or $100 more than the original ROG Ally with no extras thrown in, you have to really, really want the best possible handheld gaming experience while still tolerating Windows’ awkward fit. Asus Whats new in the Ally X Specs at a glance: Asus ROG Ally X Display 7-inch IPS panel: 19201080, 120 Hz, 7 ms, 500 nits, 100% sRGB, FreeSync, Gorilla Glass Victus OS Windows 11 (Home) CPU AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Zen 4, 8 core, 24M cache, 5.10 Ghz, 9-30 W (as reviewed) RAM 24GB LPDDR5X 6400 MHz GPU AMD Radeon RDNA3, 2.7 GHz, 8.6 Teraflops Storage M.2 NVME 2280 Gen4x4, 1TB (as reviewed) Networking Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2 Battery 80 Wh (65W max charge) Ports USB-C (3.2 Gen2, DPI 1.4, PD 3.0), USB-C (DP, PD 3.0), 3.5 mm audio, Micro SD Size 114.30.97 in. (28011125 mm) Weight 1.49 lbs (678 g) Price as reviewed $800
The ROG Ally X is essentially the ROG Ally with a bigger battery packed into a shell that is impressively not much bigger or heavier, more storage and RAM, and two USB-C ports instead of one USB-C and one weird mobile port that nobody could use. Asus reshaped the device and changed the face-button feel, and it all feels noticeably better, especially now that gaming sessions can last longer. The company also moved the microSD card slot so that your cards dont melt, which is nice.
Theres a bit more to each of those changes that well get into, but thats the short version. Small spec bumps wouldnt have changed much about the ROG Ally experience, but the changes Asus made for the X version do move the needle. Having more RAM available has a sizable impact on the frame performance of demanding games, and you can see that in our benchmarks.
We kept the LCD Steam Deck in our benchmarks because its chip has roughly the same performance as its OLED upgrade. But its really the Ally-to-Ally-X comparisons that are interesting; the Steam Deck has been fading back from AAA viability. If you want the Ally X to run modern, GPU-intensive games as fast as is feasible for a battery-powered device, it can now do that a lot betterfor longerand feel a bit better while you do.
The Rog Ally X has better answered the question why not just buy a gaming laptop? than its predecessor. At $800 and up, you might still ask how much portability is worth to you. But the Ally X is not as much of a niche (Windows-based handheld) inside a niche (moderately higher-endhandhelds). I normally would not use this kind of handout image with descriptive text embedded, but Asus is right: the ROG Ally X is indeed way more comfortable (just maybe not all-caps).Asus How it feels using the Rog Ally X
My testing of the Rog Ally X consisted of benchmarks, battery testing, and playing some games on the couch. Specifically: Deep Rock Galactic: Survivor and Tactical Breach Wizards on the devices lowest-power setting (Silent), Deathloop on its medium-power setting (Performance), and Shadow of the Erdtree on its all-out Turbo mode.
All four of those games worked mostly fine, but DRG: Survivor pushed the boundaries of Silent mode a bit when its levels got crowded with enemies and projectiles. Most games could automatically figure out a decent settings scheme for the Ally X. If a game offers AMDs FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) upscaling, you should at least try it; its usually a big boon to a game running on this handheld.
Overall, the ROG Ally X was a device I didn’t notice when I was using it, which is the best recommendation I can make. Perhaps I noticed that the 1080p screen was brighter, closer to the glass, and sharper than the LCD (original) Steam Deck. At handheld distance, the difference between 800p and 1080p isn’t huge to me, but the difference between LCD and OLED is more so. (Of course, an OLED version of the Steam Deck was released late last year.) Page: 1 2 3 Next → reader comments 79 Kevin Purdy Kevin is a senior technology reporter at Ars Technica, covering open-source software, PC gaming, home automation, repairability, e-bikes, and tech history. He has previously worked at Lifehacker, Wirecutter, iFixit, and Carbon Switch. Advertisement Channel Ars Technica ← Previous story Next story → Related Stories Today on Ars
